Windows, Mac, Linux image

For the past 5-6 months I’ve been using a MacBook in my office and at home a I’ve a laptop which dual boots between Windows Vista Home Premium and Ubuntu Ultimate Edition 1.8 64 bit. So I thought, I could write something comparing these three operating systems.


First, I would like to start with Linux or more accurately GNU Linux. I really admire the idea of free software and open source. I’ve experience with Linux since I bought my first computer long back in 1996, which was a Pentium MMX 200Mhz. I installed Redhat (not sure about the version. think it was Redhat 4 or 5) when I got enough confidence to play with Partition Magic and boot sector. Thanks to my computer, everything including an ISA sound card and PCI VGA graphics card were detected correctly. Because of my success in installing Linux, my friends were also got interested and asked me to install it for them. It was a tough job and because of that I learned many new things.


* Free software – No cost, no restrictions – complete freedom.
* Plenty of flavors optimized for different tasks like multimedia, web server, music creation.
* Excellent community – Most of the Linux distributions (or simply called as a distro), especially Ubuntu has excellent community support. So if you ran into a problem, just seek help from the community.
* Frequently updated – A good Linux distribution changes its version atleast twice every year. Compare that with Microsoft Windows. How many years in between the release of Windows XP & Windows Vista.
* Easy installation on standard hardware (by ’standard’ I mean, common and popular) – You may be surprised here, but it is true. If you’ve standard hardware, Linux is the easiest OS to install. Some distros even allow you to play games while it is installing in the background.
* Easily updatable on a good broadband internet connection – To install a new application, all you need is to search for the application in the distro’s package manager and install it. All dependencies will be taken care of automatically.
* More secure and stable – Well, this depends on the distro you choose and the packages (applications) you’ve installed. But generally Linux is considered as one of the best stable operating systems.
* Works on low end machines – While some distros are recommended only for high end machines, you can always find a distro which can make the best out of your old hardware.
* Targeted less by viruses & spywares


* May be difficult to decide which Linux flavor. The options are plenty and a ‘non techie’ user may be confused to choose the right distro. But Linux has an excellent community and just ask your questions in the forums or user groups. You can always find a linux distro for almost all of your need.
* Unstable – While it is true that Linux is one of the most stable and secure operating systems, you might’ve experienced many crashes. Well, the culprit in most cases is the packages which are not stable. For eg: popular distros like Ubuntu comes bundled with some unstable packages like Compiz Fusion, Awn etc. While these packages make Linux more eye-candy (Believe me, you don’t want to turn it off, if you enjoyed it once – even if it is unstable), it has a price to pay and that is stability. One solution to this is, one should always stick to stable packages. For eg: Debian has an excellent stable distro which comes bundled with only stable packages.
* Installation may be difficult if your hardware is not standard (less available or less popular). You might need to recompile the kernel to support your hardware. This can become a nightmare for an average user. But chances are high that, the same problem has occurred for another user and the linux community has already solved this. So just google around and find the solution.
* Updating / Installing additional package can be difficult if you do not have an internet connection. While it is extremely easy to update/install packages if you’ve an internet connection, it may be very difficult if you don’t have one because of the possible package dependency issue. So you need to manually install all dependency packages before installing your desired package.
* Lack of high quality professional software – While it is true that, Linux comes bundled with almost all applications that you need for general use, high end professionals may not find an alternative for their needs. For eg: though, there is GIMP for image editing, professionals may not find it as a real alternative for Adobe Photoshop. Same is the case with Blender for 3D modeling. It is not a real alternative for Maya or 3D studio Max. This is also the case with games in general. Though we can find some good open source 3D games, we can’t play high end games like Crysis or Need for Speed. But this is not the problem of Linux. As the use of Linux as a platform increases, software companies will be forced to release Linux versions. But a question may arise – Won’t this paid, proprietary softwares violate the Linux motto of "complete freedom"

Microsoft Windows

While I was studying for my bachelors degree in Computer Science, most of the computers in our college were running on MS DOS and a few were running on Windows 3.1. When I bought my first computer it was pre installed with Windows 95. I have tried all Windows versions till now – Windows 98, Windows NT, Windows Me, Windows 2000, Windows XP, Windows 2003, Windows Vista and the latest Windows 7 release candidate. According to many statistics more than 85% people uses Windows flavors (mostly XP). Does this mean the majority is satisfied with the Windows world? No, at least a good percentage of people – who are not ‘techy’ are forced to live with Windows because most of the computer manufacturers pre-install a Windows flavor in their machine and the non techy user may not even know there are alternatives. Also, because of piracy, people doesn’t consider the cost factor. In most cases they get it free and don’t want to try alternatives; even if they wanted to, they don’t know how to. In my experience, most people are more more comfortable with Windows versions (because they are more familiar with it) even though Linux flavors offers a lot more customization, logical grouping of programs etc. People can find programs from Windows – but don’t know where to look in Linux even though it is more logically organized. Also, the best part regarding Windows is the availability of software, device drivers etc. People think that, Windows has all device driver support and high quality softwares and compare it with Linux and think, why Linux can’t provide drivers. But, they fail to understand that, it is not Microsoft but the device manufacturers are creating drivers for it. In the case of Linux, the device manufacturer doesn’t care about providing a driver – so the Linux community has to do it and it will take time. This will change once Linux get more wider acceptance and the device manufacturers will be forced to release drivers for Linux as well.


* Most popular operating system
* Easy to use – I think, this is because most computer users started their computing with Windows and are familiar with it. However, for a hard core Linux user, Windows may be difficult to use, cluttered, unorganized Operating System.
* Applications & driver support – Undoubtedly Windows has the most number of applications – so it is preferred by professionals to Linux. Regarding driver support, I think it is "driver availability" rather than built in support by Windows. If compared in that way, Windows natively supports only a few while Linux supports the most.


* Not free, restricted, no freedom
* Not very stable – Windows is synonymous with the infamous "Blue screen of death" (BSOD). But Windows XP has changed this to an extend as it was reported as the most stable OS by Microsoft.
* Doesn’t come pre installed with good applications – All the applications – yes, no exceptions – provided in Windows OS are inferior to other commercial or even freeware alternatives. So you need to install good applications, may be even pirated softwares for doing common tasks.
* Because of the high usage, most spywares and viruses are targeted to this platform.

Mac OS X

Mac OS X is built on Darwin, an open source OS by Apple – Darwin is again based on another open source OS, Free BSD – I have only 6 months of experience with Mac. In my office, I use a MacBook(2.2 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 2 GB RAM) with Mac OS X 10.5.6. Undoubtedly, Apple is the King when making user interface. All the eye-candy without sacrificing stability and performance. Believe me, it never crashed in the six months. I like the way of installing software on a Mac. I’ve successfully modified my Linux distro to mimic almost like the MacOS interface. While it is true that you can almost mimic every aspect of MacOS in Linux, there is a problem – stability. All those are experimental packages and might crash X-Window. Unlike Windows or Linux, Mac OS X is supposed to be installed only in Mac machines (I am not forgetting that some people have successfully installed Mac OS X on normal PCs – but this is not officially supported or allowed). I think the stability of the operating system has a major role in this decision. They already know all about their hardware and how to make the most out of it.


* Excellent user interface and usability
* Stable & Secure – I didn’t mean it is more stable than Linux, Linux is also stable if you don’t install any experimental package. But I have to agree that, with all the eye-candy Mac OS X is stable as any Linux distro – this cannot be true with Linux. You have to decide between eye-candy interface or stable OS, not both – well, at least until this time. Regarding security, it is considered as one of the best – but some tests conducted on Mac reveals that it is also vulnerable to attacks but it is less targeted by hackers (only below 5% of people use mac).
* Applications – A large number of excellent professional applications are available in this platform and hence preferred by designers and other professionals.
* Easy installation of applications
* Targeted less by viruses & spywares


* Though, based on open source operating systems, it is still proprietary.
* The Operating system is limited to a specific platform
* Cost of ownership is high – User is not free to try it out by paying for the operating system alone, instead the user is forced to buy new hardware at premium prices.


If compared purely on performance and stability, I think Mac OS has an upper hand. Also unlike Linux, there are lot of commercial software available, which makes it the choice of professionals. But can we say Mac OS X is the best? Certainly not. First of all, as said above, Mac OS X is not like Windows or Linux. It is created for a particular hardware and won’t work with another hardware. Just think about Linux, it supports almost all hardware platforms – be it Intel, AMD or anything, Linux works just fine. If Linux was targeted for a particular architecture, it would’ve been more stable than Mac. Secondly, the high cost of ownership – it doesn’t give you choices, it will force you to buy something that it supports with a premium price. So, still my vote is for Linux – it will give you choices, it will give you freedom and it will make you a better human being who is not greedy and willing to share his knowledge for the fellow human beings.

Views: 69


You need to be a member of Zomi Community Network - Your Network to add comments!

Join Zomi Community Network - Your Network

Comment by Zo Muan Taang on August 6, 2009 at 11:14am
Microsoft, the so grown software giant is not a fair topic to talk between tech people or at least to web developer community. For a long time since I am in the industry, I’m too posting comments and tweets against MS. The first reason I began to hate MS is their release of Malayalam translation pack in past 2006 when I was working hard at my home to patch windows in to Malayalam. Then I turned to Linux and now? I’m back on windows for at least last two years. Here I’m gonna make you love Microsoft and MS products.

Just analyze why people are hating MS. And you will love it.
Microsoft monopoly

Microsoft monopoly

1. Software monopoly : Microsoft holds a monopoly position in Intel PC Operating Systems. Business users require to use MS Office in order to remain compatible with their business partners and customers. And internet users are now using Internet Explorer in a ratio of about 8:3 over alternative browsers. Can you really call this a monopoly? Microsoft never pressure you to use their products. They have got success in software development and people love to use them. Can you say Coca cola is having monopoly on soft drinks? Don’t be jealous.

2. Yes we agree that MS boomed IT industry in to this level. But they where not doing charity. They made fortune with it : If you are using MAC, you don’t have right to talk like this. Apple is not doing charity too. If you are Linux user, one simple fact. There are near 10K software engineers at Microsoft and suppose they all work to build OS. How many volunteers are there for OSS? shut your mouth and make an OS like Windows. Ohh you don’t like Windows, love Linux? then go for it. And never look in to Windows. There are people who love Windows.

3. Internet Explorer is a Crap : Really!!? MS released IE6 on 2001. It’s competitors were Netscape Navigator, Maxton, Opera 5. Have you ever checked your website on those browsers and compared with this eight years old technology ? you are comparing IE6 with young browsers like FF and Safari. MS is trying their best to push IE6 users to IE8. But they really can not pressure everyone because then next complaint will come.
Timeline of web browsers

Timeline of web browsers

4. Need to update hardware as we update software : If you cant afford cost for new hardware, don’t download the new software. Be happy with old ones.

5. We love Google, so hate it’s competitors : MS is not a search engine company. But they build a decision engine recently. Wait and see how long you will love Google.
Microsoft vs Google

Microsoft vs Google

The only monopoly that Microsoft has is the investment in skill, experience, training, and tools of Windows software developers themselves. The programmers, who have logged many long sessions of coding for the MS Windows environment, and with their deep immersion in its assumptions, tools, and API’s, represent millions of person-years of Microsoft assets.

It is difficult decision for a professional developer to choose an environment other than Windows (cost, usability) . The scale of that market dwarfs its competitors and opens to developers many more specialty markets than any alternative platform. Windows is perceived as a platform that will be with us for a long time to come (even though you really don’t want it).

The color of Windows is fading out day by day. Apple is becoming popular among developers. OSS is more social and reliable than past. But guys at Microsoft are not sleeping. Silverlight will become a thunder lighting. Adobe is thinking that it is competitor for their Flash. But really it is not. Google is exited to announce wave and they are all thrilled to it. Apple is playing with every year release of iPhone. Microsoft opened up in cloud with Azure Services Platform. But they are preparing another big cloud. I will post it soon.

Now tell me do you still hate MS! Or did I missed anything?. Follow me on twitter to get latest updates on Microsoft.


© 2021   Created by Zomi Community Network.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service